Sunday, May 07, 2006

Tamil Nadu Elections - Shameful Scenes

In a democracy, elections are not merely about choosing representatives and deciding which party should be entrusted with the responsibility for governance. Elections are also about political education and determining priorities for the future. But over the decades, most parties in India have failed to utilise elections as a means of mobilising public opinion to obtain a mandate for meaningful change. Instead, elections have become a way of determining who will rule.

Over the years, cynical and shameless manipulation of the poor and powerless voters through competitive populism has become the dominant feature of our elections. The current Tamil Nadu Assembly election has shown that this process of manipulating the vote has reached the nadir. The DMK-combine promised colour televisions to each family!

This is by no means the first time when a party offered freebies to the unsuspecting and hapless poor. Most candidates habitually offer money and liquor for vote. And since the early 1970s, politicians have perfected the art of using public money as inducement for vote. Ostensibly, all these promises are intended to eliminate poverty.

But the gullible poor remain as vote-banks and no significant dent is made in poverty. The Garibi Hatao politics of the 1970s and the populist policies of NTR and MGR are good illustrations of the poor becoming an assured vote bank, even as their condition remains largely unaltered. The absurd campaign of Devi Lal in Haryana in 1987 marked a new low, when he promised to give irrigation water without “depleting the power in it,” as opposed to the Congress which allegedly generated hydro-electricity before allowing it to flow into irrigation canals! Devi Lal again hit headlines in 1989 by promising to write off farm loans. The loan waiver was eventually implemented by VP Singh’s government in 1990. The credit system suffered irreparable damage, and farmers continued to be in distress after the loan waiver.

The politics of free electricity has dominated our electoral landscape for long. Several states resorted to this, including the present Congress government in Andhra Pradesh. Farmers continue to pay huge bribes for new connections or services, power supply is erratic and utilities suffer serious losses, at great cost to the taxpayer. And yet, the cynical governments resorting to such short-term ploys reap rich political dividends.

But all these pale into insignificance in the face of the brazen DMK promise to give colour television sets. By this reckless promise, the sovereign voters are converted into mendicants. The tragic death of several poor women while distributing free saris in Lucknow in 2004 forever reminds us how the voter has been reduced to a beggar. But Mr Karuna-nidhi now seeks to institutionalise such mendicancy. In such political calculations, people are not human beings with dreams and aspirations, dignity and pride. They are reduced to being voters whose compliance is necessary for the power of a few manipulators.

When poll promises are always made with an eye on the votes, what is wrong with Mr Karunanidhi’s promise? Because, this time by offering colour TV sets, the politicians have crossed the Rubicon.

Most of the subsidies and freebies offered by parties so far can be justified on the ground that they were meant to help fulfill potential or prevent suffering, or support the weak and vulnerable. But colour television sets cannot be justified on such grounds by any stretch of imagination. That is why Mr Karunanidhi’s promise has implications beyond Tamil Nadu and this election.

If such a reckless electoral tactic goes unpunished or unchallenged, who knows what tomorrow will bring? In a future election, a party may offer free motorcycles, another will promise refrigerators to all and a third will give motorcars! And why not guarantee a hundred bottles of free liquor annually to every family? And all this, with public money. This will certainly bankrupt the treasury. The election will go to the highest bidder. Once such promises are honoured, nothing much more can be done. Education may be in a perilous state, denying poor children an opportunity to enlarge their horizon and acquire skills; we may have more televisions than toilets, and people may suffer indignity, humiliation, in-convenience and ill health on account of public defecation; and public health may be in shambles, forcing millions into sickness and debt trap. But once people get televisions and scooters, the state does not have resources to do the things that it ought to do.

Therein lies the real tragedy. The state is ready and willing to do what it need not, or ought not to do, at the cost of its essential functions. Poverty is perpetuated and millions remain as vote banks, seeking alms and freebies that will never improve their condition. The netas and their families, of course, continue to thrive in the ‘service’ of the people. The servant becomes the master, lording over people, and the sovereign citizens become mendicants, propping the political fortunes of a few individuals and their kith and kin.

This must stop. If the parties have any sense of shame and spirit of public service left in them, they must come together to put an end to this culture of mendicancy. The media, busy peddling the week’s sensation, must rise above the mundaneness of daily occurrences, and mobilise public opinion to reshape politics. The time is now, before all parties subvert our democracy fully and public office becomes the preserve of the highest bidder.



D-8 Summit

The Islamic world has responded to the globalizing changes at inward-oriented and outward-oriented levels. At the first level some Islamic states joined other multi-lateral globalizing institutions with a view of benefiting from them. At the second level, the main inter-governmental institution of the Islamic world – Organisation of Islamic Countries, brought about some significant changes in its agenda and attempted to establish a dialogue with the West. However D-8 or Developing – 8 was structured not as an organization, but as a mechanism for development of cooperation among, Islamic countries from regions stretching from South East Asia to Africa. It was on 10 June 1997, the heads of state of the eight countries - Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Nigeria, Pakistan and Turkey - met in Istanbul and issued the “Istanbul Declaration” which represented the birth certificate of the D-8 Group. The idea of D-8 was mooted by Dr Necmetin Erbakan., the former Prime Minister of Turkey during a Seminar on “Cooperation in Development”, held in Istanbul in October 1996.

The main objective of D-8 to be socio-economic development in accordance with the following principles: Peace instead of conflict, Dialogue instead of confrontation, Co-operation instead of exploitation, Justice instead of double-standards, Equality instead of discrimination, Democracy instead of oppression. The principal organs of the D-8 are the Summit, the Council and the Commission. The Summit, which is the supreme body of D-8 is composed of heads of state / government of member states. It is convened every two years - the first summit in Istanbul in 1997, second summit in Dhaka in 1999, third in Cairo in 2001 and their recent summit in Tehran in 2004. Bearing in mind that the seven year long efforts to develop multifaceted cooperation among the eight countries did not produce much, the leaders has specified 10 fields of cooperation, each of which was entrusted to each member state. The fields and country coordinators are Trade (Egypt). Finance Banking, and Privatization (Malaysia), Manufacturing and Health (Turkey), Telecommunications and Information (Iran), Rural Development and Culture (Bangladesh), Agriculture including Aquaculture (Pakistan), Human resource Development and Poverty Eradication (Indonesia), and Energy (Nigeria).

May 2006 Summit at Bali:

The fifth summit of D-8 is scheduled to be held during May 9- 13, 2006 in Bali, Indonesia. Seven heads of state or government have been confirmed to attend the summit of eight developing countries (D-8). The D-8 summit is also expected to come up with a leaders' declaration on global issues, including peaceful use of nuclear power, agreements on preferential trade and pacts on administrative assistance on customs matters. The summit in Bali is expected to produce a Bali declaration and two cooperation agreements.



Deepened Disparities:

Although the achievements have increased the ability of the Islamic world to cope partially with some aspects of globalization, they have not been effective in bringing about a qualitative change in such ability. This is essentially because of various variables:

(i) Non-Homogeous: The Islamic world is not a homogeneous entity. It is divided along virtually all socio-economic and political lines of comparison including religious ones. All the countries participating to this initiative are members of other global or regional communities, and their economic and political priorities are intensified on other organizations. For Turkey, membership for the EU is the main goal of the foreign policy. For Pakistan, membership for Shanghai Cooperation Organization is essential (other than observer status).

(ii) Pressures from global powers: The Islamic world is deeply penetrated by ‘powers of globalization’. The economies and security models of the Islamic world are mostly influenced by the agenda of the Western powers. Eg, EU initiatives towards Mediterranean and some Middle Eastern and Gulf countries, on one hand generate a new understanding of trans-regional cooperation.

(iii) Rivalries and conflicts: Rivalries and conflicts among Islamic states over regional leaderships, and territorial issues are acutely clear in the case of West Asia. Iran and Turkey are members of ECO, but they compete in Central Asia. Understandably, Saudi Arabia did not join the D-8, as it seemed to compete with its own organization, the OIC.

(iv) Economic Disparity: Among the D-8 countries, Malaysia is one of the most developed and advanced countries in Southeast Asia. Turkey is considered one of the advanced countries of the Islamic world. On the other hand, countries like Iran and Nigeria, whose main income is from oil; and countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan, who, despite some changes in recent years, have not been able to improve living conditions.

(v) Geographical discontinuity: Apart from being sprinkled across disparate portions of Asia and Africa, D-8 countries also have widely different levels of economic growth. These countries do not have any geographical contiguity. They are separate pieces of land scattered all over the world, and it's not clear how these eight countries are going to form a sort of common market to promote economic development among themselves. The necessary ingredient is missing, and that is the geographical contiguity.